Home » Past Questions » English Language » Passage: The privilege of blackening one's stool is not granted to every dead chi...

Passage: The privilege of blackening one's stool is not granted to every dead chi...


Question

Passage:

The privilege of blackening one’s stool is not granted to every dead chief or queen-mother without conditions. The honour is merited only on the fulfillment of certain conditions on the part of the occupant of a stool. The blackening of a king’s stool is regarded as the greatest honour that could be conferred on a ruler; thus in many Akan states only the stools of kings who proved to be true leaders are blackened. No royal person’s stool is reserved unless he died while still a ruler. A destooled chief is the last person whose memory anybody wants to keep fresh. He must have broken a taboo or committed a serious crime to merit his degradation. He may have committed adultery with his servants’ wives; he may have bought and sold slaves, who are considered as heirlooms to the stool; he may have used the oath unreasonably; he may have cursed people. All these crimes can deprive a chief of his regal powers. Once this happens, he becomes, in the eyes of the people, more insignificant than a commoner who has no right whatever to be a chief. However, a chief may ‘die on the stool’, and yet not have his stool blackened. This is so because one must die a ‘good death’. Sudden death through an accident destroys the right to have one’s stool blackened. So does death through an unusual disease like leprosy, lunacy, epilepsy and dropsy — which, if discovered in time, are causes for destoolment. The only exception here is death in war which magnifies one’s fame and dignity. But even here, if it is found out that one fell when retreating, or running away, from the enemy, one is regarded as a treacherous and infamous leader who should be erased from all historical memory. A chief who suffered from an unclean disease, but got cured before dying, is said to have been engaged in a personal difficult war with the disease and emerged triumphant. Such a chief is worthy of respect. Suicide is, perhaps, one of the worst deaths a chief could undergo. Under no condition whatever will the stool of a ruler who takes his own life, or is killed by a ‘fetish’ be consecrated.

Answer the following question on the passage.

The most basic condition that qualifies anybody for stool darkening is

Options

A) dying a worthy death

B) having being crowned as a ruler

C) being a ruler with tangible achievements

D) having respect for traditional customs


The correct answer is B.

Explanation:

The answer is (B).
The basic condition that qualifies one for stool darkening, one has to be a ruler. Then (D) can follow after (B).

Explanation provided by Fapuro Oluwadarasimi


More Past Questions:


Discussion (2)

  • The answer is (B).
    The basic condition that qualifies one for stool darkening, one has to be a ruler. Then (D) can follow after (B).

  • Olabisi

    The answer is D. It's not about achievement or tangibility. A tangible achievement means a real thing achieved which may be good or bad. There are two perspectives suggested as regards the blackening. One is good works and another good death. Hence, these perspectives are customary laws that must be fulfilled or taken into consideration. Respect for customs is the best answer. Respect means observing to honour or doing something to honour someone/something. I find it tricky, that even in circumstances when a king cannot survive a desecrating disease, he is termed unworthy. Anyway, he is expected to have fight it victoriously in honour of their tradition.